This good news. Today the world's oceans are less than 60% warmer than we think (though still warm). As reported Los Angeles times Today (November 14, 2018), UC San Diego's Scripps Oceanographic Institute and researchers at Princeton University have been forced to return to a very broad scientific conclusion based on a published paper. Nature last month – the world's oceans were warming faster than previously thought as a result of climate change.
October 31 newspaper Nature He noted that the oceans are warming 60% more than those specified by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). On November 6, mathematician Nic Lewis published a review of Judith Curry's blog. Both Lewis and Curry are critics of scientific consensus that global warming continues and is caused by humanity.
In her blog, dated November 6, Lewis pointed out the shortcomings in the 31 October newspaper. The authors of the October 31 article agree that they are now rewrapping their calculations and that – although they show that the ocean is warmer than the estimates used by the IPCC – they "mix" the range of probability. They can no longer support the previous declaration of a 60% higher temperature increase than indicated. Now they say there is one. greater probabilitySince other studies were previously found, between 10% and 70%.
A correction has been sent Nature.
One of the writers in the Los Angeles Times reported that he thanked Ralph Keeling in the Scripps Oceanography Institute for; complete accusation Los and for notifying him of the error. Keeling told the Los Angeles Times:
When we met with insight, it was immediately clear that there was a problem. We are grateful for the rapid indication, so we can fix them quickly.
By the way, the Twitter-verse today is expected in such a situation and is expected to be held in a situation where the result of a dramatic climate is forced to retreat. Many of them comment like this:
We always knew it was garbage, but would the globalists agree with the reality or deny them once again? ** & # 39; We Really Dreamed of Error Margins & # 39 ;: Global Warming Report Made Scientists Worthless Following the Ocean Warming Questionnaire https://t.co/uVzwS7UE36
– That's the one. Chuck Patriot Santa Dude Nellis? (@ NascarChuck336) November 14, 2018
But in Twitter and elsewhere in the media, even cooler heads are weighing. This, pointing out that time must be specified once again, indicates that science is not a ine whole of facts Bu. Science is a process. One reason scientists publish is that other scientists can find errors in their work, so that mistakes can be corrected.
All scientists know that. The Los Angeles Times explained:
While articles are considered peer-reviewed prior to publication, new findings should always be reproduced before being widely accepted in the scientific community Mak
Times quoted Gerald Meehl, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research at Boulder, Colorado, as follows:
This is the way the process works. Every paper that comes out is not bullet proof or infallible. If it is being investigated, you will review the findings.
The climate convention raises the scientific error and raises the work of large ocean warming.
Scientists don't cry as "fake news," they accept the crime, solve the problem, and continue … https://t.co/kL09DHRjqz
– Scott Anderson (@Psychobiotic) November 14, 2018
Bottom line: An error was found in an article dated October 31, 2018. Nature – It shows 60% more ocean warming than the IPCC predicted. The authors accepted the error and a correction was sent to: Nature.
October 31st document in Nature: Taking the ocean temperature from changes in atmospheric O2 and CO2 composition
6 November blog post by Nic Lewis: Resplandy et al. ocean heat intake paper