Thursday , February 27 2020
Home / philippines / Justice Caguioa is no longer responsible for the PET case of Marcos-Robredo

Justice Caguioa is no longer responsible for the PET case of Marcos-Robredo



PET CASE. The Court of Cassation Joint Justice Benjamin Caguioa is no longer the deputy president responsible for election protests. Photo from SC PIO screen

PET CASE. The Court of Cassation Joint Justice Benjamin Caguioa is no longer the deputy president responsible for election protests. Photo from SC PIO screen

MANILA, Philippines – The Court of Cassation (RS) Joint Justice Benjamin Caguioa is no longer responsible for the high-risk election protests against Bongbong Marcos Vice President Leni Robredo.

"Justice Caguioa is no longer a member, because he was in the minority, I think he was banned because of his opposition," retired senior justice Justice Antonio Carpio told reporters Tuesday (October 29th). Said.

According to RS rules, when the member disappears from the vote, the situation will have to be resigned to a majority.

Caguioa and Carpio, SC's last 11-2 decision sitting as the Presidential Election Court (PET), only asking PET to make a handful of comments on legal, judicial and logistical concerns if PET continues. ) was the only dissident sitting. Marcos & # 39; s other reasons for action.

For Caguioa and Carpio, PET had to refuse Marcos' protest, because the first count of the three pilot provinces did not improve significantly for him.

Rule 65 of the 2010 PET rules says that if the pilot court is convinced by protestant or Marcos, the court may reject the protest completelyhe will most likely fail to resolve his case. "

Strong opposition

Caguioa lost his mandate, but ended up with a strong mark.

In a heavily expressed 7-page dissenting opinion, Caguioa described Marcos and Robredo's comments as "a vain exercise".

Orum I raise the question, is there anything else to say and interpret? 65. The language and purpose of the rule are clear. Review and appreciation results are equally clear. would not be dismissed, "he said.

Going further, Caguioa hit the majority for being treated privately for the case.

Ne What stops the majority from enforcing Rule 65? Neden Why is this protest accepted? sui generis (a class of its own)?"said.

Marcos asked Caguioa to be previously dismissed as responsible member and asked for justice to be blocked in the whole case, but the most forbidden was unanimously rejected last September this year.

& # 39; evil & # 39;

The results of the pilot issue showed that Robredo expanded its leadership.15,083 more votes from Marcos's selected Negros Oriental, Iloilo and Camarines Sur pilot provinces.

Caguioa says the court can't. "Take a blind look at the numbers."

Caguioa, "Numbers do not lie. They express everything as it is. When the numbers come to a definite conclusion, the Court, society and the nation does not take into account the consequences of doing an evil," he said.

Majority power, a I perit the ruling or the majority defended the verdict, saying it only gave the necessary process to both camps.

"It was designed to fully listen to various legal issues related to the parties' discussions. It is not a finding for or against the protestant or the protester," the 57-page majority ruling said.

The Marcos camp asked the Supreme Court to authorize the photocopy of the results of the first census so that it could begin to comment on the problems raised by the PET majority.

Banc talks to continue on November 5th I Rappler.co


Source link