A new and important climate survey conducted in Nature magazine appeared worldwide to find that the oceans were warming much faster than previously thought – but researchers withdrew this result after writing a blog about the flaws they found in the newspaper in England. .
Only two weeks after its publication, the authors reviewed their articles and conclude that the oceans are beginning to warm up rapidly – but other measurements are the same.
A study co-author took responsibility for the error. Izyon I accept responsibility for the examinations because it was my job to ensure that the details of the measurements were properly understood and taken by the helpers, bir writes co-author Ralph Keeling, a statement of this revision.
CATASTROPHIC GLOBAL WARMING AFTER WORK
The error was first discovered by Nic Lewis, a retired British male, who holds a bachelor's degree in mathematics from Cambridge University and is studying science books for entertainment. He has also written several articles on climate science.
Her I've always liked to understand the world all the time and to check if people's research is meaningful for me. When I find something that seems wrong to me, I like to go under it, bir Lewis Fox News said.
Lewis said the incident should serve as a stimulating tale.
AL GORE, GLOBAL WARMING HAS BEEN BETWEEN, ACADEMIC OPINIONS
. I think that the fact that a study is peer-reviewed and published by a first-degree journal gives very little assurance that the findings are valid.
, I didn't realize that peer reviewers or the editor didn't look like a distinct red flag on page 1 of the paper, “he added.
Lewis said that the referees that approved this document could have looked at the errors more closely, because the result provided a general consensus that global warming was an extreme crisis.
& # 39; arbitrary & # 39; SETTINGS INCREASE SEA LEVEL, FIND WORK
But everyone, including Lewis, agrees that man-made greenhouse gas emissions are heating the oceans.
Dır People should not be left with the impression that the errors in this article are in doubt about the warming of the ocean. . Lewis is entirely or largely caused by human greenhouse gas emissions. Lewis
The co-author of the study, who took responsibility for the mistake, made this point.
CLIMATE CHANGE WARNING: WE ARE TOUCH 12 YEARS
"Evidence of ocean warming continues to be supported by millions of temperature readings in the oceans of the international network of Argo sensors," Keeling told Fox News.
The network of slang sensors consists of about 4,000 buoys that observe the world. The work done by Keeling and his assistants has attempted to predict ocean temperatures in a completely different way eye using atmospheric oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) measurements rising when ocean oxygen rises and releases gas K eeling
Keeling said that such a study is still of value.
GLOBAL WARMING RUIN BEER, SCIENTISTS WARN
Or Our work also provides independent evidence that the ocean is warming up. We recognize that our method does not precisely determine the amount of warming, as we have already thought, in Keeling added.
Keeling also acknowledged that Lewis pointed out the error.
Tir The scientific process is to correct itself when errors or new evidence is discovered. Keeling gave Nic Lewis a hat for his role.
CLIMATE CHANGE TOOLS WORLD'S BIGGEST SHIPPING FIRM CHAIRS NEW ROAD
While the world is warming up – government data show that the planet is about 2 ° C warmer than the 1970s – researchers such as Lewis show that climate models are not that big and can handle warming.
Or Climate science suffers from being politicized, “Lewis says. ”The idea of consensus and models is very much affected iklim it is likely that warming is less severe than global climate models.“
The author, Maxim Lott, Executive Producer of Stossel TV and creator of ElectionBettingOdds.com. Twitter accessible @maximlott