About a month after the first release, Microsoft was able to reinstall Windows October 10, 2018. This update was canceled immediately after the first attempt to deploy because an error occurred when some users lost data.
Windows 10 is automatically saved
Typically, Windows functional updates are automatically distributed in stages that offer new downloads at specific time intervals; this will not be an exception for this period. First, a new system version installation proposal takes two groups of people: people who are looking for updates manually, and people using the custom media creation tool to implement the new system. If these users do not enter new errors, Windows 10 will be available to other users in the coming weeks.
Interestingly, Microsoft's first unsuccessful attempt to upgrade the system is often inadequate and the release date of the new version is 13 November. This is important for the "support windows" operating system. The support period has started since Windows Server 2019 and Windows Server 1809.
Microsoft will tighten software testing and development processes, due to the inconvenience some enthusiastic users have prepared for the Windows 10 update. A data loss error occurred prior to the release of the official update by a user of Windows Insider, but due to unknown reason, Microsoft did not take these complaints seriously seriously: Microsoft's response was limited to a new feature – pre-release testers were given the opportunity to detect every error detected. marked by importance level. For example, an error leading to data loss is no doubt more important than ugly-looking icons or text that is improperly aligned. However, it is still difficult to say how ranking will improve the quality and effectiveness of error reporting.
What will Microsoft change?
As for a longer runtime, Microsoft has pledged more openness to the release of the Windows 10 development and testing process, and you can expect to learn more about how operating system manufacturers change attitudes and processes over the next few months. The quality of Microsoft software is already evaluated at different levels and in different sizes. For example, when users started to complain after the release of the operating system update, a "initial quality error" was recorded regarding the stability and reliability of the new functional update. Detecting this kind of error indicates that the experienced operating system controllers do something wrong. On Tuesday, problems with cyber security enhancer updates, problems associated with "long-term quality", and problems with the reliability and efficiency of the weekly updates appeared.
Although Microsoft explicitly acknowledges the problem with the latest update, the company is evaluating the operating system's course well. Managers of the company rely mainly on some indicators used to assess the satisfaction of the operating system. The first of these is the "incoming frequency" after each update of the system or the number of complaints received from users. During the entire life of Windows 10, this indicator was permanently rejected. This means that Microsoft has done a good thing. However, events can be misleading. A Windows 10 error with a large number of users is a cosmetic error that receives more messages than a more serious event (such as data loss) from fewer users. Although this is undoubtedly more important than the second type of event.
Another indicator is a "net promoter score" or an estimate of how users recommend each version of Windows 10 to friends and family. Representatives of the company believe that this indicator is rising and that the spring version of Windows 10 is the best estimate of all time. However, this indicator may not show serious problems encountered by a small number of users.
The Windows user base is large and complex – 700 million. Consumers, 35 million. The gadget is 175 million. different versions, 16 million Unique drives and hardware combinations – so the possibility of a particular configuration being specific to a particular configuration is huge after another. Data loss was associated with only one of the following configurations: Windows users did not affect the standard configuration, but those that were using certain atypical settings were damaged.