Tuesday , August 9 2022

Why is it toxic to spreading fear in the fight against HIV and Aids?


According to this author more

When the first case was reported in Kenya, several steps were taken since 1984, including the HIV and AIDS pandemic.

Through awareness-raising, the country is now the illiterate of the disease. Many people know spreading and control mechanisms.

Moreover, while antiretrovirals now reach millions of people, the prevention of maternal-child transmission has helped reduce infections in children.

However, the earnings recorded over the years are gradually discharged by stigmatization associated with the disease. Although a few have overcome the stamping label, others live with denial.

While they are not aware of this fact, organizations and volunteers that bring anti-HIV campaigns to the forefront are not only ordinary in their approach, they also do not have the skills to deal with such a sensitive issue.

I am not sure whether policies on HIV prevalence are designed to disseminate fear or to provide information and provide solutions, because the negative perception approach is only a toxic drug that produces punctured efforts.

First, sexual intimacy is a choice. But sexual behavior and elections are the recklessness of elections that reveal risks.

Again, the existence of friendly options such as condom use encourages irresponsible behavior among sexually active ones.

Behavioral changes and sound choices are very important for reversing risky engagements.

The HIV test is voluntary according to the HIV and Aids Prevention and Control Act 2009. This action also guarantees privacy and privacy, as well as the protection of those who are discriminated against.

However, strategy proposals, such as common management systems, do not clarify that they are executed under the so-called network without violating constitutional provisions.

In addition, this approach may break the expansion of network networks if masked in advance.

The prevalence of spreading along aging braces is a result of untested policy approaches. Blind group messaging and targeting only simplifies the prevalence of another grouping that is perceived to be more secure.

Public perception is key when it comes to social inclusion. When they occur and when they occur, their impact should be assessed to prevent dams.

By the way, issues of sexuality are complex and mechanically difficult. The only way out of the changing marsh is to create a strategy by creating policy strategies that offer solutions and do not disseminate fear on less risky choices. Fear of contracting is groundless.

Again, the widespread view that infected people can only be unhealthy weak is unfortunate, so there is a need to enter more topical issues about living things adapted to sexuality.

Consider the gray areas that take shelter in the nerves. These include non-compliance, doctor-patient confidentiality, church confessions and miracles, and cetera.

Source link