- Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, the chairman of the CDU to get rid of the application words.
- Wolfgang Kubicki gives the scooters on the sides.
- And the other guests have done nothing about the program.
An hour later Maybrit Illner said, ın We have to make a point here and do it pretty quickly, and then the question is to put the exact point of the room. Behind a relaxed conversation on Thursday evening, he has once turned the problems of almost all sides, even once before they get to the surface? Is it behind a winged exchange of the talk show professionals who routinely describe their statements? Or is Annegret behind Kramp-Karrenbauer's job interview?
When the CDU applies for the national presidency and in December it is asked to be called for Angela Merkel to succeed, she doesn't even have to go to the polls. Only this last Maybrit sends the record of the Illner talk show to delegates, then they know what the secretary is, what he wants, and what he can do. If the party members do not have time to watch the entire program, take a look at the program's Twitter timeline, because you have carefully listed most of the _A_K_K_ statements.
More than two dozen statements attacked Illner's editors at the show. Each half-way detachable sentence is immediately reflected, and in fact, the banal should act as the dominant explosive. "I've argued with Angela Merkel several times, and I can say from my own experience: it can be extremely loud." This sentence appears twice. Potter bin: The chancellor can also be loud. Hammer message. So far, everyone has assumed that Angela Merkel always decides in a whisper.
And then there's the commitment to make a series of election campaigns behind him. "In the end, people want someone who takes them seriously, and that's why I don't see my chances bad." First of all, there will be documents that it is deprived of a firm.
Perhaps you should have written it like a movie title from the beginning: "_A_K_K_. She really wants it." Then you get rid of the contradiction between the main player and the really used title. "New alliances, old facades – what's after Merkel?" and almost exclusively against the fact that it was about Kramp-Karrenbauer. Clearly, the candidate wants to calculate this exactly that, which leads to think that the supernatural, that accounting, it can be calculated, they are boring.
In this context, it is also difficult for Illner to show serious interest. When Kramp-Karrenbauer makes his first statements with admirable precision, but largely without feeling in the room, the moderator is pleasantly spoiled. Or We know this text from them, now we are becoming more concrete, “he says. But unfortunately, it does not become more concrete. On the contrary it is general, because it gives a buzz after the other. Soli, anchor centers, state failure, diesel and minimum wage, they all offer. No difficulty for the applicant. The one who called the clashes from the class.
The rest of the guests did not bother much. These are only required as reference stations for breaks in the flow of speech between Kramp-Karrenbauer and Illner. But the hostess seems to not really care about her. If the CDU continues somehow, and as you know, even the CDU does not know how to proceed, it wants to know how everything will continue. The interviewees say that this depends on how it continues, but does not want to be connected to it. And then the return of Kramp-Karrenbauer.
A certain disinterestedness of the server
In the meantime, a certain indifference to the main character's glow can be seen as if no one is really taking their candidacy seriously, as if everyone is already targeting one of the other two candidates who will win.
Of course, this is not really fair, but if Illner's editor calls, then you only risk a few points of view. But then you can get rid of him before an interested spectator.
On the left, Janine Wissler condemned injustice and misinterpreted the role of political adviser Michael Spreng and intervened moderately, as Wolfgang Kubicki gave the Spielfeldrandspötter to the FDP almost as usual. You can say you know better. Whatever happens. Juso head Kevin Kühnert is about to end with serious seriousness.
A short dialogue about the future of the CDU is a sign of a lack of salary. ? He must reinforce himself in the Great Coalition, ”Spreng told Kubicki. and it gets a very concise answer: "Making sound policies." My buddy gets the explosion when he says the CDU has to make a reasonable policy. There was no one in the party.
But these guests are not already. This is about Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, who seems to find the moderator a bit boring. "Can you chancellor?" She wants to be a bit stiff at some point but at the end of the problem I know she can never get a satisfactory answer.
Shortly after the end, Kubicki gives to the partisans. ”The free Democrats fear no death or evil, lar he says, giving the SPD one further confident name: ne It's better than fighting better.“
At the latest point, the presenter is probably very happy that someone opened the clock and had an aeration per hour. Illner looks at the camera and tells the last sentence. "We have to make a point here and do it very quickly." At the end of liberation.