Friday , June 24 2022

Olympic champion He Zi bought a house and lost 1.6 million yuan won – Chinanews.com



[ad_1]

He was awarded 1.6 million yuan with the Olympic champion He Zi buying a house.
Due to the delay in the purchase of the house, the real estate license was not opened, the court ordered the seller to pay 700 thousand deposit and pay 1.6 million yuan.

Before I got married, I wanted to buy a wedding room, unexpectedly, the other party did not have a real estate license that led to the transfer of their own home: the Olympic diving champion O Zi, who would sell the host Ms. Luo to the court and to return the deposit and the economic damage to the other party. he will ask him to compensate. Yesterday morning, the Beijing Chaoyang Court announced the case and ordered the two parties to cancel the purchase contract. The machine compensated the deposit of 700,000 yuan and the difference of 1.6 million yuan.

According to He Zi's representative, in January 2016, O Zi and Ms. Luo signed a göre contract of sale & for a house in Laiguangying Town in Chaoyang District, Beijing. The contract stipulated: Ms. Luo sold that house to Zi for a price of 8.25 million yuan, and had to pay a deposit of 700,000 yuan. At the same time, the contract, the house subject to the case has not yet received the ownership certificate of home. The estimated duration of April 2016 & # 39; d. After receiving the certificate of ownership of the house, the seller assigns the ownership of the buyer and the transfer, according to the contract.

She said that she had fulfilled her contractual obligations comprehensively and appropriately after the contract was signed, and that Ms. Luo had ordered a payment of 700,000 yuan. At the same time, He Zi also sold a house in the Apple Community at Baizi Bay to prepare for the payment of subsequent housing. However, since that time with Ms. Luo, the other party has always claimed that the property title certificate is in the process of processing. In the end, it is clear that the house deed certificate cannot be obtained for personal reasons, which may result in the inability to transfer ownership of the house. Therefore, Zi appealed to the court and asked the other party to return his deposit and compensate him for the economic loss.

Ms. Luo, a saleswoman against the prosecutor's office, said she received residential loans through bank loans in August 2012 through the sale of normal commercial housing. On December 24, 2013, the developer delivered the house which was included in him. According to the format article of the format Beijing Commercial Residential Presales Contract göre published by the developer, the certificate of property acquisition should be obtained in 1278 days after the delivery of the house. Ili Registration of property rights can be completed before the month. "

Ms. Luo said that she actively fulfilled the contract after signing the yerine sales contract m with Zi. In January 2016, he paid the housing loan in the dwelling and in March of the same year he applied to the developer who applied to transfer the ownership. During the accident, the developer was told to the CCB that the information entered by the computer was inconsistent with the information provided by him and that the property registration of the house in question could not be addressed. Ms. Luo said the accident that occurred during the performance of the contract could not be controlled in advance. He said he was willing to refund the deposit, but refused to compensate the difference.

Yesterday morning, the court of Chaoyang publicly declared the case. The court found that the reason why the trial house could not apply to the document was because Ms. Luo did not have the right to buy a house.

In the course of the application of the edi sale contract Mahkeme, the Court held that Mrs Luo could not obtain a residential real estate certificate for his own reasons; this prevented the continuation of the a sale contract aç between the two parties, which led to subsequent disputes. The defense argues that the "sale contract" cannot fulfill the non-subjective and uncontrollable unexpected situations. However, in connection with the review of the court, Ms. Luo did not have the authority to buy a house in Beijing when she bought the property in 2012, thus creating a breach of contract. Finally, the court ruled that the two parties had canceled the "Beijing Securities Housing Sales Agreement" signed on January 9, 2016, and Ms. Luo Hezi made 700,000 yuan return from Ding and compensated for the difference of 1.6 million yuan. Text / reporter Feng Lingyu

[ad_2]
Source link